View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2005
bleedglory bleedglory is offline
Helping Wounded
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
bleedglory seems reasonably okay
Default Re: four "good" characters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Eternal
In some way, all the main Lost characters have a problem in some form or another. Kate's the criminal, Sawyer a conman, Jack has multiple less-severe issues, Charlie is/was a drug addict, Locke with is abandonments, Sayid was a torturer, as well as everyone I didn't mention.
Very true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Eternal
The main three I can think of that don't exactly fit into any catagory - probably will, but we haven't had flashbacks yet - Libby, Rose, Bernard, and Eko.
Who's Libby? I don't recall a "Libby" on Lost. hmm...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Eternal
Eko...I'm not sure about him. I think there are elements in his past that he's fled from and will have to atone for.
Sounds good to me. Who's to argue with a vauge but solid theory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Eternal
Rose and Bernard are more difficult. Bernard could be in just about any direction - he could have stolen something, commited adultary, anything.
I doubt it. He seems sincere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Eternal
Rose is the hardest...they've made her out to be near perfect, like an angle. Deffinatly "good" - yet she's still there. I don't know.
They could kill her off. It would explain the lack of flashbacks.
Reply With Quote